(Vermont) State proposes antler restrictions
 
(Sent Tuesday, 13 January 2004)
 

By Matt Crawford
Free Press Staff Writer

        The most drastic change in the way Vermont's deer herd is managed has made it off the drawing board, and could affect hunters as soon as October 2005.

        Deer hunters in Franklin, Chittenden and Rutland counties, get ready: Antler restrictions might be coming your way.

        Recommendations contained in a Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department paper being released this week would put in antler restrictions during archery, rifle and muzzleloader seasons for a test period of five years in Wildlife Management Units B and K2.

        WMU B is a large part of Franklin County and some of northern Chittenden County. WMU K2 is in Rutland County.

        "It's a great start," said hunter Harry Dewyea of East Fairfield. "A lot of guys are going to feel that it's not enough, but it's a huge step in the right direction."

        By placing antler restrictions on deer -- essentially making it illegal to shoot a spikehorn buck -- the department hopes to increase the number of older, bigger-racked bucks running around the woods.

        The recommendations are part of what the department is calling "Comprehensive Deer Management." The recommendations arise from a deer hunter survey the department conducted last year.

        Sixty-six percent of those who answered the survey said they favor antler restrictions to limit the number of young bucks killed each fall by hunters.

        If the recommendations evolve into a managament plan, it will represent one of the biggest changes in Vermont deer hunting in more than a century, but
approval from the public, the seven-member Fish and Wildlife Board and the Legislature will be needed in order to proceed.

        Rep. Steve Adams, R-Hartland, has introduced a bill this legislative session that would allow the Fish and Wildlife Board to pass antler restrictions regulations.

        "There's not a biological need for this," said John Buck, lead deer biologist for the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department. "This will be a social experiment -- an experiment in hunter satisfaction."

        In addition to changing the definition of a legal buck, the state would likely recommend an increase in the antlerless deer -- most often does -- that would be shot by hunters in WMU B and K2.

        "That's something we're going to have to experiment with," Buck said. "Clearly, if you keep one class of deer on the range, you can't keep another. We need to balance the overall number of deer in an area to keep in line with the carrying capacity of the habitat."

        Justin Lindholm of Lindholm Sport Center in Rutland said the department's ideas might have some support in Rutland County, but could face opposition.

        "An increase in doe permits will be tough for some landowners," Lindholm said. "Some of them won't buy that."

        Public pressure to change Vermont's deer hunting regulations came to a head late last year in a random survey the department mailed to 5,000 hunters. That survey, answered by 2,122 people, showed Vermonters have a strong interest in having more mature, bigger-racked bucks in the population.

        Young bucks -- deer that are 1 years old and are typically spikehorns or small-racked four-pointers -- make up a majority of the bucks shot in Vermont each year. Annually, 50 to 60 percent of the bucks shot during youth, archery, rifle and muzzleloader seasons are 1-year-olds.

        Lindholm said he wonders if the push for larger bucks will play well with the general public.

        "I believe the average person in this state won't like this QDM effort," he said. "The hunters might like it, but the average person might think hunters are after trophies, not meat." 


Back to Index Page